Drug Dilemmas Essay

Read Case 5.2 on pp. 226- 228 Drug Dilemmas. (Of course, you must read Chapter 5 antecedent to reading the case Chapter 5 is very interesting in many respects. We need to ensure whether corporations receive social responsibilities and whether they have moral responsibilities in addition to making profits. You can see its a difficult balance to attain.Go to pages 202-203 to read about Corporate Moral Agency and the 2010 overbearing Court ruling giving corporations First Amendment rights. As you know, the First Amendment gives us, among another(prenominal) rights, the freedom of speech. Although corporations had limited personhood rights prior to the 2010 decision, now they have rights indistinguishable from individual citizens. Justice Roberts believes that a corporation, just like an individual, has many diverse interestsindistinguishable from the individual who owns them.Now, perhaps we need to reevaluate the responsibilities that accompany the rights given to corporations. I f a corporation has rights liken to a living human person, then what responsibilities accompany such important rights?Here are both(prenominal) ideas we should be addressing in this forum1. Given the nature of their product, do pharmaceutical companies have honorable responsibilities that other corporations dont have? In your view, are the large U.S. drug companies good corporate citizens? (Hint have in mind Chapter 2 and the Kantian good will, do no harm, always promote good, categorical imperative mood, or the useful view of the grea try good for everyone involved.)2. Assess the motivations of drug companies that do their testing afield. Do you think test subjects are existence exploited? Under what circumstances, if any, are companies morally justified in testing overseas?3. Finally, do drug companies have an obligation to make new drugs available to patients who were involved in their breeding in the U.S. or overseas?No, I dont feel that pharmaceutical companies have eth ical respnsiblilities that other corporation dont have. The reason I feel like this is because pharmaceutical companies have the ability to conduct research and save money and by while conducting their research overseas they head off any restreiction of the FDA. That when you can go to Kantian good will, do no harm, allways promot good categorical imperative or utilitarian view of the greatest good for everyone involved. To use Kantian again, people are existence used as guinea pigs, because when using patients in studies and not being able to continue to help them afterwards the study is not ethical to me. I do think that by tesing overseas the subject is being exploited because the help is not continueouly. They have the ability to test overseas circumventsLets select in this fascinating topic using your knowledge you have gained thus far. The discussions will be grated fit to this scaleVery good, 10 points educatee demonstrates full understanding of the reading hearty and application of the material and moral theories to this case. Good, 8-9 points student demonstrates basic understanding of the reading material and application of the material and moral theories to this case. Fair, 6-7 points student demonstrates partial understanding of the material, but provides some important insights.